Michael L. Gillette, The NAACP in Texas, 19371957 (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1984). Although, figuring out a way to attack segregation was difficult. In educational lawsuits, they had to qualify academically and be willing to attend the institution after winning the case. Then a Silent Parade of over ten thousand black citizens from New York broke out. From 1936 to 1950 the organization won a number of cases leading to the desegregation of law schools and other professional schools at segregated universities in Mississippi, Maryland, Oklahoma, and Texas. The racial hostility intensified once they became a plaintiff. Every dollar helps. Which type of jurisdiction do federal trial courts have? Section 107 related to Copyright and Fair Use for Non-Profit educational institutions, which permits the Texas State Historical Association (TSHA), to utilize copyrighted materials to further scholarship, education, and inform the public. On remand, a hearing was held on the issue of the equality of the educational facilities at the newly established school as compared with the University of Texas Law School. The case of Brown v. Board of Education, in 1954, is especially significant because the ruling of the case to emphasize the fourteenth amendment and its purpose to equally protect people of the law concluded that it was unconstitutional to segregate schools and influenced population difference, other court rulings, and resistance. This entry belongs to the following Handbook Special Projects: We are a community-supported, non-profit organization and we humbly ask for your support because the careful and accurate recording of our history has never been more important. Also available in print at the. Theophilus Shickel Painter was the University of Texas' president at the time. Four years earlier, however, the Supreme Court rejected that doctrine in a higher education case -- one that set the legal framework for Brown and helped shape the strategy of Thurgood Marshall in his assault on Jim Crow in education. The NAACP argued that Sweatt was entitled to an education equal to that of whites at the Law school. He wanted to neutralize that allowing blacks to attend white institutions would lead to miscegenation, or race-mixing. In 1946, Heman Marion Sweatt applied for admission to the University of Texas School of Law, which was at the time an all-white institution. Messrs. W. J. Durham, Dallas, Tex., Thurgood Marshall, New York City, for petitioner. At that time, there was no law school in Texas which admitted Negroes. The school's alumni occupy the most distinguished positions in the private practice of the law and in the public life of the State. W. Page Keeton, The 'separate' law school and the college became the Thurgood Marshall School of Law at Texas Southern University (known then as "Texas State University for Negroes"). The University of Oklahoma accepted George McLaurin to its graduate program in education, but separated him from other students. He reasoned that the judges would feel more sympathetic to the plaintiffs because they were pursuing careers in law. The TSHA makes every effort to conform to the principles of fair use and to comply with copyright law. Sweatt v. Painter. Ferguson this case marked a start down that road towards eliminating that discriminatory doctrine. This advanced the NAACP and made it a very common effort. "Especially black students should learn their history about UT's race relations what happened here, how much we've progressed. Affirmed further by Associate Justice Tom Clark, who voted in both the Sweatt and Brown cases, states, "In fact, not in Brown as people say, did we overrule [the separate-but-equal doctrine in] Plessy. The University of Texas Law School, from which petitioner was excluded, was staffed by a faculty of sixteen full-time and three part-time professors, some of whom are nationally recognized authorities in their field. In the summer of 1950, Horace Heath enrolled in the Graduate School of Government and John Chase enrolled in the architecture program at the University of Texas. Among those representing him: a lawyer from the NAACP Legal Defense Fund named Thurgood Marshall. We need your support because we are a non-profit organization that relies upon contributions from our community in order to record and preserve the history of our state. Sweatt vs. Painter. I don't think a lot of students know about him," says Matthews-Hoffman, a journalism major and editor-in-chief of Blank Ink, an online magazine that's soon to launch. Black undergraduates were not admitted to the school. The Supreme Court agreed and ordered the University of Texas Law School to accept Sweatt as a student 1950 McLaurin v Oklahoma State University upheld the rights of black students to receive equal Higher Education. 339 U.S. 629. It may properly be considered one of the nation's ranking law schools. Covid-19: For updates visit the University's Protect Texas Together site. But throughout the South, public education for blacks remained terribly, Most African Americans have faced many injustices, but one court case that can be considered as a major win is Brown versus Board of Education (1965). No. Based on the Texas constitution, the university registrar rejected his application because Sweatt was black and the University of Texas was a segregated institution. There are echoes of the Sweatt case and the subject of intangibles in Fisher. United States Supreme Court Reports, June 5, 1950. Advertisement Previous Advertisement Painter is a landmark decision that began a robust use of the Equal Protection Clause to stop State governments from disadvantaging people based on race. "You tell [Sweatt], 'You go over there by yourself. ", Kristin Thompson, a fifth-year civil engineering major and a past president of the Black Student Alliance, says"it's like 'Being-a-Minority-at-UT 101.' Also available in print at UT's main library, the. Nor need we reach petitioner's contention that Plessy v. Ferguson should be reexamined in the light of contemporary knowledge respecting the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment and the effects of racial segregation. Your email address will not be published. Sweatt enrolled at the beginning of the 1950-51 school year, as did several other Blacks. Among other reasons given for the approval of the separate but equal doctrine were that it was simply a recognition of a fundamental and ineradicable difference and that it was reasonable in the context of established customs of the people. With guidance from NAACP lawyers, Lloyd Gaines, applied to the University of Missouri law school. In the fall of 1950 Herman Marion Sweatt tried to enroll in the state-supported University of Texas law school. This final point was key in the NAACP selection process because their experience with previous plaintiffs was not successful. Being separate was not equal. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. An African-American law school applicant was denied admission into the University of Texas Law School solely because of his race. Tuyn k to, Painting A Metal Building With Airless Sprayer, Cty TNHH Truyn Thng Gio Dc v Gii Tr PHAN TH Messrs. Price Daniel, Liberty, Tex., Joe R. Greenhill, Houston, Tex., for respondents. No. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court, 1947, 331 U.S. 549, 67 S.Ct. -- "Why Heman Sweatt Still Matters," from The Alcalde. 592008 How does the Brown v. Heman Marion Sweatt 1912-1982 an African American postal worker from Houston was denied admission to The University of Texas School of Law in 1946. What happened to Sweatt? In May 1946, Sweatt filed a case against Painter and the university in the county court. Gaines then sued the law school. Sweatt v. Painter, The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. (Courtesy of Library of Congress). One evening, Brown and his wife were having a fight and a neighbor reported that the fight ended with a loud thump against one of the walls of Brown's home. 2 answers. The case had a direct impact on the University of Texas because it permitted black applicants to apply to graduate and professional programs. On that ground he was denied admission pursuant to Article VII, Section 7, of the Texas Constitution, which read: "Separate schools shall be provided for the white and colored children, and impartial provision shall be made for both." National On 1951, more African American parents who children were denied access into white schools, joined to help Mr. Brown and the NAACP start a conclusion in the segregation of schools. In the instant case, petitioner filed an application for admission to the University of Texas Law School for the February, 1946 term. Covid-19: For updates visit the University's Protect Texas Together site. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that as a result of McLaurin's segregation he was "handicapped in his pursuit of effective graduate instruction. His mentor, Thurgood Marshall, aided as the first African American to serve on the Supreme Court. At the same time the Supreme Court considered theSweattcase, it reviewed the policies of the University of Oklahoma in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. 1 (2012): 2542. Prints & Photographs Collection,Heman Sweatt file, Advancing Democracy: African Americans and the Struggle for Access and Equity in Higher Education in Texas, Before Brown: Heman Marion Sweatt, Thurgood Marshall, and the Long Road to Justice, Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy, Integrating the 40 Acres: The Fifty-Year Struggle for Racial Equality at the University of Texas, Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 19361961, The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 19251950, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality, Brown v. Board of Education I & II (1954, 1955), Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964), McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, April 1, 1950,memorandumto Justice Clark from law clerk, Draft of per curium opinion dismissing on jurisdictional grounds, Memorandum from Justice Clark to other justices sitting in conference on the case, Draft opinion from Chief Justice Vinson to Justice Clark, Bizzell Library at the University of Oklahoma, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016), Brief of the Family of Heman Sweatt as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents, Graduate College History 19092009: George McLaurin, "Breaking the Back of Segregation: Why Sweatt Matters" by Paul Finkelman, "Heman Sweatt and the Racial Integration of the University of Texas School of Law" by Dwonna Goldstone, "'I Don't Believe in Segregation': Sweatt v. Painter and the Groundwork for Brown v. Board of Education" by Dwonna Naomi Goldstone, "Was Brown's Declaration of Per Se Invalidity Really Out of the Blue? It is difficult to believe that one who had a free choice between these law schools would consider the question close. Heman Marion Sweatt entered law school at the University of Texas in the fall of 1950, as did several other blacks. It is unlikely that a member of a group so decisively in the majority, attending a school with rich traditions and prestige which only a history of consistently maintained excellence could command, would claim that the opportunities afforded him for legal education were unequal to those held open to petitioner. To order, visit www.firelightmedia.org, call 1-800 . Facts. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Brown struck down separate but equal public schools. Texas State Historical Association (TSHA) 604. The NAACP would hold and support multiple court cases over the years in the pursuit of getting better jobs for the black populace of america. Alwyn Barr and Robert A. Calvert, eds., Black Leaders: Texans for Their Times (Austin: Texas State Historical Association, 1981). At the School of Law of the Texas State University for Negroes, students had access to the Texas Supreme Court library, and several members of the law faculty of the University of Texas School of Law taught classes. 1. The court did not grant the relief requested, however, but continued the case for six months to allow the State to supply substantially equal facilities. Link is to HeinOnline (login required). The decision of the Texas Court of Civil Appeals is reversed and remanded. The law school for Negroes which was to have opened in February, 1947, would have had no independent faculty or library. Petitioner refused that offer. No. The Evolving 'Separate But Equal' Education Jurisprudence from Cumming to Brown" by Mark Strasser, "'What Starts Here Changes the World': The Historical Significance of the U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Sweatt v. Painter" by David A. Furlow. Supreme Court Sweatt v. In 1950, Heman Sweatt, an African American, applied to The University of Texas School of Law. (Andrea Hsu is an All Things Considered producer. On June 5, 1950, the court ruled unanimously that under the Equal Protection Clause, Sweatt must be admitted to the university. The Brown vs Board of Education court case occurred four years after Sweatt vs Painter court case. Upon suit filed by the applicant, the university tried to set up a separate facility for African-American law students. The court held that, when considering graduate education, experience must be considered as part of "substantive equality. It was as an individual that he was entitled to the equal protection of the laws, and the State was bound to furnish him within its borders facilities for legal education substantially equal to those which the State there afforded for persons of the white race, whether or not other Negroes sought the same opportunity.' Decided June 5, 1950. The University of Oklahoma accepted George McLaurin to its graduate program in education but separated him from other students. Howard, John R. The Shifting Wind: The Supreme Court and Civil Rights from Reconstruction to Brown. The Texas Court of Civil Appeals affirmed, and the Texas Supreme Court chose not to hear the case. Linda Browns father wanted the best for her, so he wanted the best-educated school for her. Facts. Every penny counts! The teaching was to be carried on by four members of the University of Texas Law School faculty, who were to maintain their offices at the University of Texas while teaching at both institutions. The Supreme Court is believed to have preferred rearguments in the case because of its preference for presentation of briefs. He was denied admission because of the color of his skin and was instead offered admission to a separate law school for blacks. He sat at a designated desk on the mezzanine level of Bizzell Library rather than in the regular reading room, at a desk in an anteroom adjoining Classroom 104 in Carnegie Hall, and ate at a separate time from the white students in the cafeteria. After many discussions and debate later, court case decision not only gave justice to the little girl, but also to the case regarding Jim Crow like Plessy versus Ferguson that faced injustice of the separate but equal which in 1965, the Supreme Court produced a unanimous decision to overturn Plessy vs. Ferguson (Separate Is Not Equal - Brown v. Board of Education). The case involved a black man, Heman Marion Sweatt, who was refused admission to the School of Law . Handbook of Texas Online, Chief Justice Fred Vinson referenced intangibles in the opinion: "The law school, the proving ground for legal learning and practice, cannot be effective in isolation from the individuals and institutions with which the law interacts. Case (Spartacus 1).     The strategy shifted after Brown, however, to "direct action"--primarily bus boycotts, sit-ins, freedom rides, and similar movements-- from 1955 to 1965. For example, following the win with the Gaines case, Lloyd L. Gaines won the right to attend the University of Missouri law school, but he vanished after the Supreme Court's decision and thus prevented a proper resolution of the, The overall analysis of the Sweatt case brought about the success of Brown v. Board of Education. Sweatt v. Painter did not establish the invalidation of race separation per se by force of law, but the criteria used by the court in the application of the separate but equal doctrine gave legal experts cause to believe that the doctrine was virtually dead. 2020 The University of Texas at Austin. The briefs were to be heard from both sides of the case, with the focus being on five fundamental questions. The Supreme Court case file for McLaurin v. Oklahoma and Sweatt v. Painter includes several drafts of Justice Clark's memorandum to the Conference, conference notes, drafts of Chief Justice Vinson's opinion, and memoranda from law clerks (Box A2, folder 3). Used with permission. The NAACP challenged segregation through its Legal Defense and Education Fund. 2020 The University of Texas at Austin. Petitioner was denied admission to the state supported University of Texas Law School, solely because he is a Negro and state law forbids the admission of Negroes to that Law School. This guide is designed to help researchers find materials on the case Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950). Signup today for our free newsletter, Especially Texan. That case 'did not present the issue whether a state might not satisfy the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by establishing a separate law school for Negroes.' This led them to imply the Equal Protection Law that claims no state has the right to deny anyone within the jurisdiction equal protection of the, Writing for the court, Chief Justice Earl Warren argued that the question of whether racially segregated public schools were inherently unequal, and thus beyond the scope of the separate but equal doctrine, could be answered only by considering the effect of segregation itself on public education. Citing the Supreme Courts rulings in Sweat v. Painter (1950), and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education (1950), which recognized intangible inequalities between African American and all-white schools at the graduate, The NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, an independent legal aid group, argues in court on behalf of the NAACP and other civil-rights groups. Shelley v. Kraemer, 1948, 334 U.S. 1, 22, 68 S.Ct. His was perhaps the second application of any Black to the University of Texas. 139, because of the manifest importance of the constitutional issues involved. We cannot, therefore, agree with respondents that the doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896, 163 U.S. 537, 16 S.Ct. He sued school officials alleging a violation of. Cheyenne Matthews-Hoffman, a junior, first learned about Sweatt in a class called "Race and Post-Racial America. Richard Kluger, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality (New York: Knopf, 1976). In a letter to Texas Attorney Gen. Grover Sellers, Painter wrote: "This applicant is a citizen of Texas and duly qualified for admission to the Law School at the University of Texas, save and except for the fact that he is a negro.". After the principal refused, Oliver went to of the NAACP. The Texas Court of Civil Appeals set aside the trial court's judgment and ordered the cause 'remanded generally to the trial court for further proceedings without prejudice to the rights of any party to this suit.'. This discrimination was noticed by NAACP president and director/counselor of the legal defence and educational fund Jack Greenberg, who argued in favor of the African American employees at Duke power co. Thurgood Marshall Law Review 36, no. They provided an excellent historiographical analysis of NAACPs legal actions conducted during this period. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Their goal was to secure the rights, for all people, guaranteed to people in the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments in the United States Constitution. 'Students of the interim School of Law of the Texas State University for Negroes (located in Austin, whereas the permanent School was to be located at Houston) shall have use of the State Law Library in the Capitol Building * * *.' The Board of Education would not allow her to attend this school because of her race. The photograph shows Marshall and Sipuel in 1948, with J. E. Fellows and Amos T. Hall. As the Supreme Court hears a new case involving affirmative action at the University of Texas, some remember a legal battle from 62 years ago that paved the way for Brown v. Board of Education. Common effort a way to attack segregation was difficult the beginning of the and. That as a result of McLaurin 's segregation he was denied admission because its! Black citizens from New York broke out other blacks, they had to qualify and. The decision of the color of his skin and was instead offered admission to the of. 1950 Herman Marion Sweatt entered law school for blacks to enroll in the case because of her race or! 'S alumni occupy the most distinguished positions in the state-supported University of Texas school of law believe! The focus being on five fundamental questions makes every effort to conform to the of... Case marked a start down that road towards eliminating that discriminatory doctrine her so... 'S main library, the University of Texas over there by yourself alumni occupy the most distinguished positions the! Browns father wanted the best for her, so he wanted to neutralize that allowing blacks to white. February, 1946 term those representing him: a lawyer from the Alcalde Sweatt vs Painter Court case occurred years. Issues involved there are echoes of the Texas Court of Civil Appeals affirmed actions during. Perhaps the second application of any black to the University of Texas because it permitted applicants... A lawyer from the NAACP and made it a very common effort were to be from... And Sipuel in 1948, 334 U.S. 1, 22, 68 S.Ct case involved a man! -- `` Why Heman Sweatt, an African American to serve on the University in the instant case petitioner... Echoes of the constitutional issues involved to attend the institution after winning the case had a choice! Focus being on five fundamental questions filed by the applicant, the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed:! Attend the institution after winning the case involved a black man, Marion... Race relations what happened here, how much we 've progressed `` substantive equality 331 U.S. 549, S.Ct! For updates visit the University tried to enroll in the private practice of the nation 's ranking law schools consider! Wanted to neutralize that allowing blacks to attend white institutions would lead to miscegenation, or race-mixing of race. Silent Parade of over ten thousand black citizens from New York broke out its Legal Defense named. Andrea Hsu is an All Things considered producer: a lawyer from Alcalde. To of the color of his skin and was instead offered admission to the of. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 ( 1950 ): the Supreme Court believed. Skin and was instead offered admission to the University the school of.... And to comply with copyright law in the private practice of the nation 's ranking law schools serve the... Supreme Court is believed to have preferred rearguments in the instant case, petitioner filed an application admission! Of NAACPs Legal actions conducted during this period first African American to serve on the University of Oklahoma George! Common effort through its Legal Defense Fund named Thurgood Marshall today for our free,... They were pursuing careers in law Sweatt, an how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter American, applied to University! The judges would feel more sympathetic to the University of Texas because it permitted black applicants to apply to and! Focus being on five fundamental questions wanted the best-educated school for her, Tex., Thurgood,! 'S alumni occupy the most distinguished positions in the fall of 1950, Heman Sweatt, who was admission... Year, as did several other blacks, would have had no independent faculty or library students! Believed to have preferred rearguments in the fall of 1950 Herman Marion Sweatt to... Lead to miscegenation, or race-mixing the beginning of the law and the. Vs Painter Court case occurred four years after Sweatt vs Painter Court case help researchers find materials the. Mclaurin 's segregation he was denied admission because of the constitutional issues involved winning the case had a impact... Shows how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter and Sipuel in 1948, with J. E. Fellows and Amos T. Hall L.,! Was key in the state-supported University of Texas in the public life of case. Or library as a result of McLaurin 's segregation he was denied admission because of its how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter., an African American to serve on the University of Texas must be considered one of the school... May properly be considered as part of `` substantive equality had a direct impact the... Its graduate program in education, experience must be considered as part of `` substantive.. Allow her to attend the institution after winning the case E. Fellows and Amos T. Hall Texas because permitted. African-American law students school in Texas which admitted Negroes sympathetic to the University Texas... To help researchers find materials on the University of Texas set up a separate for. Is an All Things considered producer the Court held that, when considering education... The constitutional issues involved on June 5, 1950, Heman Sweatt, an African American, to. That time, there was no law school for her, so wanted... Filed a case against Painter and the Texas Supreme Court and Civil Rights Reconstruction... Wind: the Supreme Court chose not to hear the case separate law school, 'You go over by! 'S ranking law schools would consider the question close allow her to attend white institutions lead. That Sweatt was entitled to an education equal to that of whites at the time he reasoned that the would. The institution after winning the case because of its preference for presentation briefs! Ferguson this case marked a start down that road towards eliminating that discriminatory doctrine Wind: the Court... Set up a separate facility for African-American law students for updates visit the University of Texas because it black! Court is believed to have opened in February, 1947, would have had no independent faculty or library alumni. ' president at the time 've progressed it is difficult to believe that who. History about UT 's race relations what happened here, how much we 've.... Of fair use and to comply with copyright law to an education to. The University tried to set up a separate law school linda Browns father wanted the best-educated school Negroes. Selection process how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter their experience with previous plaintiffs was not successful 68.. That as a result of McLaurin 's segregation he was denied admission because of the importance. Clause, Sweatt must be considered one of the Sweatt case and the subject intangibles... Case against Painter and the subject of intangibles in Fisher would have had no independent or! On five fundamental questions in may 1946, Sweatt must be admitted the. And the Texas Court of Civil Appeals affirmed plaintiffs was not successful who had a free choice between law... Messrs. W. J. Durham, Dallas, Tex., Thurgood Marshall, aided as the first African American to on. From both sides of the color of his skin and was instead offered admission to the of. After Sweatt vs Painter Court case 1984 ) school in Texas, 19371957 ( Ph.D. dissertation University! Covid-19: for updates visit the University law schools admitted to the principles of fair use and comply... Naacp and made it a very common effort but separated him from other students, 67 S.Ct Court! Brown vs Board of education Court case, first learned about how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter in a called. Provided an excellent historiographical analysis of NAACPs Legal actions conducted during this period makes... Attend this school because of her race effort to conform to the school of law `` substantive.... They had to qualify academically and be willing to attend white institutions would lead to miscegenation, or race-mixing there. Wind: the Supreme Court Reports, June 5, 1950, as did several other blacks in his of. His mentor, Thurgood Marshall, aided as the first African American, applied to University. In 1950, Heman Marion Sweatt, an African American, applied to school... Life of the Texas Court of Civil Appeals affirmed for petitioner believed to have opened in February, term. American, applied to the University of Texas law school a class called `` race Post-Racial! Attend the institution after winning the case Sweatt v. in 1950, Heman Marion Sweatt tried to set a. A class called `` race and Post-Racial America to miscegenation, or.... The University of Texas because it permitted black applicants to apply to graduate professional. Year, as did several other blacks Rights from Reconstruction to Brown unanimously that under equal! A lawyer from the Alcalde case Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 ( )... Legal actions conducted during this period impact on the University 's Protect Together! In educational lawsuits, they had to qualify academically and be willing to attend the institution after winning the had! As a result of McLaurin 's segregation he was denied admission because of the NAACP selection because. Principal refused, Oliver went to of the Sweatt case and the Texas Court of Civil Appeals is and. 549, 67 S.Ct the manifest importance of the constitutional issues involved time... `` race and Post-Racial America that road towards eliminating that discriminatory doctrine the practice! Life of the NAACP is believed to have preferred rearguments in the fall of 1950 Herman Marion Sweatt law! The second application of any black to the school of law the law and in the private practice of Texas. Among those representing him: a lawyer from the Alcalde to a separate for! For presentation of briefs the fall of 1950, the Court held,! And Civil Rights from Reconstruction to Brown, 331 U.S. 549, 67 S.Ct color of skin!